Also, a good security device when you go away on holiday!

I buried my dad under the rhubarb patch, he’s been making jam for the last eight years; that’s the environmentally friendly option :0)



Comments:
12 Comments posted on "Do Crematoriums add to global warming and if so, would Taxidermy be a more environmentally friendly option?"
Lady blue dawg on April 28th, 2010 at 9:24 am #

excellent suggestion-I would love to continue in that way.It would be great if I could have a martyred expression on my face to make everyone feel guilty forever–hahahahahhaaaaaa
References :


podge on April 28th, 2010 at 9:40 am #

Get stuffed!
References :


The Mock Race see on April 28th, 2010 at 9:58 am #

Be a bit weird though last time i checked i had a bit of bum fluff but as for fur would it be to costly to say store us in vinegar like they do in laboratorys and that What with this Sudden Urgency we are all under too go Green you do relise we could halt the Earth from Dying if we can Solve this Problem
References :
Great big Meteor will be arrriving shortly anyway like the going away Security thing what with everything else thats going on the last thing i need to think about is wether my house is being robbed I also took some time to think About this and this could belike a multipurpose thing Wait how about this rite listen how about having them sat besides you Whilst Driving that also complies with recent green issues what with the why dont they fill the car up if they are all going the same way


chris at hornchurch on April 28th, 2010 at 10:46 am #

yes cremation is now regarded as environmentally unfriendly.
in japan for example where ground space is short for burial’s and cremation not a good idea. storage in specially built ‘flats’ for bodies is becoming popular.
a new idea is to dry freeze ( liquid nitrogen) an then vibrate the frozen body so it shatters into very small fragments like dust for disposal.
a suggestion to recycle the body has met with resistance but will be more acceptable In say 50 years time.
References :


laura100 on April 28th, 2010 at 11:34 am #

ARE YOU MAD?!
References :


Gooch on April 28th, 2010 at 11:48 am #

Actually taxidermy done by the usual methods add alot of chemicals to the ground water the freezedrying seems to be the best bet for the future
References :


golden umbrella on April 28th, 2010 at 12:22 pm #

Don’t you think the planet is crowded enough without a load of stuffed bodies hanging about? Just imagine your house with granny, grandad x 2 mum, dad etc etc ………………..
References :


Marcus on April 28th, 2010 at 12:43 pm #

I buried my dad under the rhubarb patch, he’s been making jam for the last eight years; that’s the environmentally friendly option :0)
References :


? on April 28th, 2010 at 1:17 pm #

can you imagine after 50 years of stuffed people instead of buried or cremated, after a few hundred years there’d be more stuffed than alive
References :


grovesmuk on April 28th, 2010 at 2:07 pm #

Crematoriums generally don’t produce very much air pollution. In a air pollution study we did for an old crematorium we found the emissions were equivelent to running a small diesal van.

Digging a grave would probably release just as must co2, as for taxidermy, I dont know, but I would imagine the processes envolved would involve co2 production.

As climate change is primarily driven by natural processes, crematoriums are unlikely to contribute to any warming other than locally due to the heat generated.

How about some soylant green instead?
References :


peltonwheeler on April 28th, 2010 at 2:22 pm #

taxidermy only uses the outer skin ,thats why they are known as stuffed The bodies are still disposed of , could be used as pet food .
References :


Beatrice on April 28th, 2010 at 2:27 pm #

Mr Tumnus, are you seriously suggesting we all get stuffed?
References :


Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: